Talent 100
2026 Edition
Unveiling the Vanguard of Global Research
Explore measuresHE’s inaugural Talent 100, powered by a sophisticated suite of proprietary metrics designed to provide a more holistic view of individual research gravitas. We look beyond traditional h-indices and volume-based counts to reveal the true influence and trajectory of scholars in the modern academic landscape.
A Snapshot of Excellence
The rankings below showcase an exclusive view of the Top 100 talents across six subject domain. However, our comprehensive analysis evaluates the impact of hundreds of thousands of active researchers across all major disciplines. Contact us today to access the complete dataset and discover the rising stars within your field.
Need Deeper Insights?
These tables provide a high-level view of excellence across broad domains. Contact us to commission bespoke talent analyses tailored to your institution’s specific department structure or strategic recruitment priorities. Unlock the full power of our analytics by joining our upcoming webinar to learn how to leverage the Talent 100 dataset to manage your institution's talent pipeline
Recognition for Featured Scholars
Scholars recognised in the Talent 100 are invited to feature our digital ranking badge on their academic profiles and institutional pages. This badge serves as a prestigious mark of excellence, indicating global recognition in this year's assessment. Contact us to claim your digital toolkit.
While the inaugural Talent 100 features top researchers across six key domains, the Arts and Humanities category has been excluded to ensure the ranking's integrity. Current eligibility criteria, which prioritize high-frequency article outputs, do not yet fully capture the scholarly impact of monographs and long-form chapters central to this field. To maintain our commitment to fairness and accuracy, we are currently refining a more nuanced framework for this domain and look forward to debuting a representative Arts and Humanities ranking in a future edition.
| Rank | Name | Institution | Publication volume | Typical research quality | Best works | Research gravitas | Collaboration intensity | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Joseph Sarkis | Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France; Worcester Polytechnic Institute | 71.0 | 95.4 | 86.9 | 99.2 | 70.2 | 87.5 |
| 62 | Kangyin Dong | University of International Business and Economics | 72.4 | 94.1 | 93.7 | 92.0 | 74.1 | 87.3 |
| 62 | Vinit Parida | Luleå University of Technology | 67.6 | 98.2 | 87.7 | 99.2 | 64.6 | 87.3 |
| 64 | Dongmin Kong | Huazhong University of Science and Technology | 80.7 | 88.6 | 86.9 | 91.5 | 87.0 | 87.2 |
| 65 | Vanessa Ratten | La Trobe University | 99.3 | 71.2 | 91.6 | 98.9 | 88.2 | 87.1 |
| 66 | Marina Dabić | University of Dubrovnik; University of Ljubljana | 83.7 | 89.2 | 87.1 | 89.7 | 78.9 | 86.9 |
| 67 | Haitao Wu | Hainan University | 67.2 | 98.1 | 90.5 | 97.4 | 58.9 | 86.7 |
| 67 | Rangan Gupta | University of Pretoria | 100.0 | 66.7 | 93.2 | 97.0 | 99.9 | 86.7 |
| 69 | Léo‐Paul Dana | Dalhousie University | 98.7 | 77.1 | 87.7 | 85.1 | 97.0 | 86.6 |
| 70 | Sanjoy Kumar Paul | University of Technology Sydney | 77.4 | 89.7 | 88.7 | 98.9 | 64.4 | 86.4 |