Talent 100

2026 Edition

Business and Economics

Unveiling the Vanguard of Global Research

Explore measuresHE’s inaugural Talent 100, powered by a sophisticated suite of proprietary metrics designed to provide a more holistic view of individual research gravitas. We look beyond traditional h-indices and volume-based counts to reveal the true influence and trajectory of scholars in the modern academic landscape.

A Snapshot of Excellence

The rankings below showcase an exclusive view of the Top 100 talents across six subject domain. However, our comprehensive analysis evaluates the impact of hundreds of thousands of active researchers across all major disciplines. Contact us today to access the complete dataset and discover the rising stars within your field.

Need Deeper Insights?

These tables provide a high-level view of excellence across broad domains. Contact us to commission bespoke talent analyses tailored to your institution’s specific department structure or strategic recruitment priorities. Unlock the full power of our analytics by joining our upcoming webinar to learn how to leverage the Talent 100 dataset to manage your institution's talent pipeline

Recognition for Featured Scholars

Scholars recognised in the Talent 100 are invited to feature our digital ranking badge on their academic profiles and institutional pages. This badge serves as a prestigious mark of excellence, indicating global recognition in this year's assessment. Contact us to claim your digital toolkit.

While the inaugural Talent 100 features top researchers across six key domains, the Arts and Humanities category has been excluded to ensure the ranking's integrity. Current eligibility criteria, which prioritize high-frequency article outputs, do not yet fully capture the scholarly impact of monographs and long-form chapters central to this field. To maintain our commitment to fairness and accuracy, we are currently refining a more nuanced framework for this domain and look forward to debuting a representative Arts and Humanities ranking in a future edition.

Methodology

Rank Name Institution Publication volume Typical research quality Best works Research gravitas Collaboration intensity Overall Score
1 Chien‐Chiang Lee City University of Macau 99.9 98.5 97.5 100.0 99.9 99.1
2 Satish Kumar Sunway University 99.6 96.4 95.4 99.7 97.4 97.7
3 Sascha Kraus University of Johannesburg; University of Siegen 97.4 99.6 94.7 100.0 90.7 97.6
4 Elie Bouri Lebanese American University 99.7 94.3 95.9 99.1 98.9 97.0
4 Muhammad Umar Lebanese American University 95.3 99.4 95.5 99.6 89.0 97.0
6 Muhammad Abubakr Naeem United Arab Emirates University 96.7 97.7 94.6 97.3 90.8 96.3
7 Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo Near East University 94.3 96.9 96.8 99.2 89.7 96.1
8 Muhammad Shahbaz Beijing Institute of Technology 96.0 95.5 95.0 99.2 92.0 95.9
9 Chi‐Wei Su Qingdao University 96.6 96.2 94.9 95.8 93.1 95.7
10 Xuan Vinh Vo University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City 99.8 90.1 95.7 99.0 99.1 95.6