Talent 100

2026 Edition

Business and Economics

Unveiling the Vanguard of Global Research

Explore measuresHE’s inaugural Talent 100, powered by a sophisticated suite of proprietary metrics designed to provide a more holistic view of individual research gravitas. We look beyond traditional h-indices and volume-based counts to reveal the true influence and trajectory of scholars in the modern academic landscape.

A Snapshot of Excellence

The rankings below showcase an exclusive view of the Top 100 talents across six subject domain. However, our comprehensive analysis evaluates the impact of hundreds of thousands of active researchers across all major disciplines. Contact us today to access the complete dataset and discover the rising stars within your field.

Need Deeper Insights?

These tables provide a high-level view of excellence across broad domains. Contact us to commission bespoke talent analyses tailored to your institution’s specific department structure or strategic recruitment priorities. Unlock the full power of our analytics by joining our upcoming webinar to learn how to leverage the Talent 100 dataset to manage your institution's talent pipeline

Recognition for Featured Scholars

Scholars recognised in the Talent 100 are invited to feature our digital ranking badge on their academic profiles and institutional pages. This badge serves as a prestigious mark of excellence, indicating global recognition in this year's assessment. Contact us to claim your digital toolkit.

While the inaugural Talent 100 features top researchers across six key domains, the Arts and Humanities category has been excluded to ensure the ranking's integrity. Current eligibility criteria, which prioritize high-frequency article outputs, do not yet fully capture the scholarly impact of monographs and long-form chapters central to this field. To maintain our commitment to fairness and accuracy, we are currently refining a more nuanced framework for this domain and look forward to debuting a representative Arts and Humanities ranking in a future edition.

Methodology

Rank Name Institution Publication volume Typical research quality Best works Research gravitas Collaboration intensity Overall Score
11 Boqiang Lin Xiamen University 99.9 87.3 97.9 100.0 100.0 95.2
11 Tsan‐Ming Choi University of Liverpool 96.7 94.5 92.6 100.0 89.2 95.2
13 Yogesh K. Dwivedi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals 91.6 99.9 95.1 99.3 75.6 95.0
13 Heesup Han Sejong University 97.2 93.6 96.2 97.0 89.8 95.0
15 Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade 99.9 87.1 97.8 99.1 98.5 94.8
16 Dmitry Ivanov Berlin School of Economics and Law 92.5 99.2 88.9 100.0 79.2 94.5
16 Derviş Kırıkkaleli European University of Lefke 95.1 92.0 94.4 98.6 94.3 94.5
18 David B. Audretsch Indiana University Bloomington; University of Klagenfurt 95.9 91.9 91.0 99.2 96.2 94.4
19 Brian M. Lucey Trinity College Dublin 95.4 94.7 92.1 95.0 91.4 94.2
20 Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary Keio University; Tokai University 99.2 87.6 93.8 98.0 97.0 93.9